Metal Oxide Varistor for IEC 61000-4-5 Surge Compliance

February 26, 2026 | tags metal oxide varistor  IEC 61000-4-5 surge protection  MOV disc size selection  MOV clamping voltage  industrial power surge protection   | views
Comments 0

SUNTAN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED · ALL KINDS OF CAPACITORS
Metal oxide varistor selection for IEC 61000-4-5 surge protection requires energy-based sizing, correct disc diameter, and proper placement at the power entry point. This guide explains MOV sizing, surge current handling, and layered protection for AC power systems.
Metal Oxide Varistor IEC 61000-4-5 surge protection MOV disc selection

Power systems that pass functional testing often fail during IEC 61000-4-5 surge validation. The failure mode is typically controller reset, communication loss, or power latch-up, indicating insufficient surge energy handling or incorrect MOV placement.

Surge Stress Characteristics

IEC 61000-4-5 defines a combination wave with a 1.2/50 µs open circuit voltage and an 8/20 µs short circuit current. This waveform delivers significantly higher energy than ESD and requires surge protection devices to be selected based on peak current and absorbed energy rather than clamping voltage alone.

TSV and TSVG metal oxide varistors provide nonlinear voltage-dependent resistance and support varistor voltages from 18 V to 1800 V with peak current capability scaling with disc diameter.

Common MOV Design Failure Modes

Undersized MOV discs experience thermal stress during repetitive surge. MOV voltage ratings too close to AC RMS cause continuous leakage and aging. Single-stage protection without impedance coordination increases residual stress. Long trace placement increases overshoot due to parasitic inductance.

Disc Size and Surge Energy Relationship

Disc Size Typical Surge Capability Use Case
5D Low energy Secondary DC protection
7D Moderate energy Adapters and small SMPS
10D Industrial low power Control boards
14D High surge Motor drives
20D Very high surge Mains distribution

Larger disc diameter increases peak current and energy capability but also increases capacitance and footprint.

Parameter-Driven MOV Selection

Step 1 Determine maximum AC RMS voltage and select MOV AC rating above steady-state voltage. Step 2 Identify surge level such as line-to-line 1 kV and line-to-ground 2 kV. Step 3 Calculate peak current using the 8/20 µs waveform. Step 4 Select disc size with sufficient energy margin. Step 5 Verify clamping voltage against downstream component limits.

Thermal and Lifetime Considerations

MOV degradation is cumulative. Each surge increases leakage current and shifts varistor voltage. Design must account for repetitive surge, thermal spacing, and avoidance of operation near maximum continuous voltage.

Placement Strategy

Place the MOV at the power entry point with short traces. Install across line and neutral for differential mode protection. Add line-to-ground MOV when required by surge category.

Layered Protection Architecture

MOV handles high surge energy but does not always reduce residual voltage to IC-safe levels. A coordinated network may include a common mode choke and a secondary clamp at the DC rail to reduce stress on control ICs.

Application Example AC-DC Industrial Power Supply

Input AC 230 V with surge requirement of 1 kV line-to-line and 2 kV line-to-ground. Use a 14D MOV across line and neutral with series impedance before the bridge rectifier. Verify DC bus clamping voltage and system recovery after surge.

Verification Method

Measure DC bus clamping voltage during surge. Monitor MOV temperature under repetitive pulses. Check leakage current after stress testing. Validate functional recovery time.

Design Parameters Required

AC RMS voltage and tolerance Surge level and coupling mode Peak current waveform Number of pulses Maximum allowable clamping voltage Available PCB space

Conclusion

IEC 61000-4-5 surge compliance requires MOV selection based on energy, peak current, disc diameter, and placement. Coordinated protection reduces residual stress and improves system reliability.

Post Comments:

Archives